Skip to main content

Veranstaltung «KI: Welche Zukunft für die mehrsprachige Schweiz?»

Dienstag, 16. Juni 2026, 17.30 bis 20.00 Uhr
Polit-Forum im Käfigturm, Bern

Die künstliche Intelligenz (KI) verändert die mehrsprachige Kommunikation in Unternehmen und staatlichen Organisationen. In der Schweizer Bundesverwaltung, wo die Mehrsprachigkeit sowohl ein verfassungsmässiger Grundsatz als auch ein zentrales Prinzip für den nationalen Zusammenhalts ist, werfen diese Entwicklungen grundlegende Fragen auf: Ist KI eine Chance zur Stärkung der Mehrsprachigkeit, oder stellt sie eine Gefahr dar?

Anlässlich der Veröffentlichung einer Pilotstudie des Zentrums für Demokratie Aarau (ZDA) im Auftrag der Delegierten des Bundes für Mehrsprachigkeit bringt diese Abendveranstaltung Expert:innen, Praktiker:innen und Entscheidungsträger:innen zusammen. Wir freuen uns, Sie zu dieser Diskussion begrüssen zu dürfen.

Anmeldeschluss: 15. Mai 2026

Programm und Anmeldung
Programm Französisch
Programm Italienisch

Download the 2026–2029 Development Plan now

«Democracies around the world are facing increasing pressure»

What are the causes of the current crisis in democracy? How does it affect the organization of a state? What does this mean for freedom of speech and assembly, or the separation of powers? These questions lie at the heart of the research conducted at the Center for Democracy Studies in Aarau.

Our new Development Plan for 2026–2029 outlines how our work aims to address these questions. In it, we outline the direction of our research, the partners we collaborate with, and how we are positioned as an interdisciplinary center.

Democracy research across continents

This year’s Swiss Summer School in Democracy Studies saw a significant step toward the internationalization of research collaboration: the University of Zurich (UZH) and the University of Canberra (UC) signed a memorandum of understanding. The agreement marks the beginning of a deeper institutional partnership between the Center for Democracy Aarau (ZDA) and the Centre for Deliberative Democracy and Global Governance at UC.

The cooperation between the two centers goes beyond the Summer School: Close scientific ties already exist today – for example, through reciprocal research visits, joint publications, and international project applications, including to the SNF, Horizon Europe, and the Australian Research Council. The memorandum of understanding now provides a formal basis for this successful collaboration.

Basis for future projects

The agreement was signed in the presence of both partner institutions: Prof. Daniel Kübler (UZH/ZDA) and Prof. Simon Niemeyer (UC) formalized the agreement. The aim is to promote the exchange of researchers and students, to hold joint courses and conferences, and to launch new research projects.

With this MoU, UZH and UC are sending a strong signal for the expansion of international cooperation in democracy research and making an important contribution to networking science and practice in a global context.

Zentrum für Demokratie Aarau, Medienmitteilung, Überdurchschnittliche Mobilisierung der Bürgerlichen bei Aargauer Volksabstimmung

Above-average mobilization of the middle classes in the Aargau referendum

On May 18, 2025, the voters of Aargau approved a revision of the tax law, while the popular initiative «Equal pay in the canton of Aargau – now!» was rejected. It was significant that the middle classes in general and FDP sympathizers in particular took part in the votes. In addition to the left-right divide, trust in the government also played a major role in the tax law. In the case of the equal pay initiative, however, there were clear differences between the genders and age groups. This is shown by the survey on the cantonal referendum on May 18, 2025, which was conducted at the Center for Democracy Studies Aarau.

In the cantonal referendum on May 18, 2025, voters in Aargau approved a revision of the tax law with 54%, while the popular initiative «Equal pay in the canton of Aargau – now!» was rejected with 63%. Voter turnout amounted to just 31.6%, which can be linked to the fact that no votes were held at federal level.

Highest turnout in the ranks of the FDP

In terms of voter turnout, it is worth noting that ideological positioning played a major role: respondents who categorized themselves as right-wing (6-7) or far right (8-10) were more likely than average to vote (41% each). In contrast, slightly fewer than 30 percent of those in the middle of the political spectrum, as well as those on the left and far left, went to the polls. This means that the middle classes were better mobilized than voters in the center and on the left.

Looking at party sympathies, the extraordinarily high proportion in the ranks of the FDP (61%) is striking. No other party supporters took part in the cantonal votes anywhere near as often. In second place were the supporters of the GLP (43%), followed by the center (40%), those of the SP (38%) and the SVP (32%). Of the six largest parties in Aargau, the Greens were the least successful in mobilizing their base (29%). Among those not affiliated to a party, however, less than one in six people entitled to vote took part (15%).

Tax law – also a matter of government trust

Voting behavior on the tax law was strongly influenced by the left-right divide. On the far left, the bill was clearly rejected with a no vote of 81%. In contrast, almost as many on the far right were in favor (69%). The decisive factor in this constellation was the center, where a narrow majority in favor of the revision resulted (55%).

There were also clear differences in support for the tax law according to party affiliation. While the majority of FDP supporters approved the bill (75%), the tax law met with less approval among the other three major parties in Aargau, which had also issued a «yes» slogan. Among sympathizers from the center (60%), the GLP (56%) and the SVP (54%), only narrow majorities resulted in favour of the tax law. A remarkable contrast also emerged in the left-wing camp. In contrast to the supporters of the SP, who clearly rejected the bill (72%), the tax bill was approved by every second person among Green Party supporters (50%).

In addition, the voting decision depended heavily on trust in the government. Those with a high level of trust in the Aargau cantonal government were 72% likely to approve the bill. In contrast, the proportion of those with very low to low trust in the cantonal government was only 28%.

Among the «yes» motives, two considerations were in the foreground: the most common reason given for acceptance was the competitiveness of the canton of Aargau in tax competition (19%). The tax relief for the middle classes was cited almost as often (18%). On the other hand, almost half of those against were primarily bothered by the fact that the wealthy would be favored (47%).

Equal pay initiative – gender and age as key factors

The equal pay initiative revealed striking demographic differences. Gender was the most important factor. Overall, the women who took part were divided. In fact, every second woman was in favor of the popular initiative (50%). In contrast, only around one in four men who took part supported the proposal (27%). Women also attached greater importance to the equal pay initiative than men.

Age also played a major role. In general, approval decreased with increasing age. On the one hand, the clear acceptance among the youngest category of 18 to 29-year-olds (65%) and the clear rejection from the age of 50 are striking. The «yes” share in this segment amounted to less than 30%.

In terms of party sympathies, it can be stated that the equal pay initiative was clearly accepted on the left. A clear majority of Green supporters voted in favor of the proposal (83%), while three out of four SP supporters ultimately voted yes (75%). The supporters of the GLP (34%), the center (34%), the SVP (27%) and the FDP (17%) rejected the popular initiative, which was in line with the party slogans. As with the tax law, the FDP base was characterized by a particularly high degree of unity.

There were two main reasons for rejecting the equal pay initiative: almost one in three people who rejected the initiative stated that there was no need for cantonal regulations if equality laws already exist at federal level. This was followed by concerns about smaller companies that already have a high administrative burden (24%). On the favorable side, the view that equality has not yet been achieved enough was in first place (24%). The need for legal provisions was also important for approval (19%).

Further resources

Bernhard Laurent, Cheon Junmo, Lüscher Sandro, Koelewijn Kymani Shayra, Sorrentino Gianluca, Serdült Uwe. «FOKUS Aargau: Studie zu den Aargauer Volksabstimmungen vom 18. Mai 2025.»FOKUS-Aargau-Berichte, 11. Aarau: Zentrum für Demokratie Aarau (ZDA), Juli 2025. (German)

Contact

Dr. Laurent Bernhard
Project coordinator, Center for Democracy Studies Aarau
laurent.bernhard@uzh.ch

About the CDA

The Centre for Democracy Studies Aarau is a scientific research centre supported by the University of Zurich, the University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, the Canton of Aargau and the City of Aarau. It conducts basic research and addresses current issues relating to democracy – regionally, in Switzerland and worldwide. www.zdaarau.ch

Zentrum für Demokratie Aarau, Medienmitteilung, Politische Meinungsbildung: soziale Medien als Underdog?

Political opinion-forming: social media as the underdog?

Even though political parties spend large sums on social media campaigns during referendum campaigns, Instagram, Facebook, and other platforms are only a key source of information for a few when it comes to voting. How does this fit together? Results from a research project by the Center for Democracy Studies Aarau provide clues and raise questions about the regulation of social media.

One thing is clear: social media still plays a small role in shaping public opinion in Swiss elections. Nevertheless, parties invest considerable sums in social media campaigns during elections and referendums to convince voters of their positions. Data from the post-vote survey on the Environmental Responsibility Initiative (UVI) of February 9, 2025, from the “Direct Democracy Switzerland in the 21st Century (DDS-21)” project (see box) now provide two indications why the role of social media in political opinion-forming in Switzerland should not be underestimated. This also raises the question of social media regulation.

Users today are the young, but they are also getting older

As expected, people aged 18-24 used social media most frequently: First, in the youngest age group, more than a third of voters used social media specifically to inform themselves about the proposal. At the same time, only around 10 percent did not use social media at all. Thus, social media was only crucial for political information in the run-up to votes for a small number of eligible voters. However, because media habits remain relatively stable, this will likely change in the future, giving social media a more important role.

Daniel Kübler, professor at the Center for Democracy Studies Aarau, explains what this means: «Today’s young people frequently use social media. This accessibility also offers political actors the opportunity to reach young voters at an early age and mobilize them for politics.»

Minimum standard for political content

As the importance of social media increases, the question of how to regulate Instagram, Facebook, and other platforms arises. Based on the study’s findings, it can be argued that now is the time to conduct a social and political debate about possible regulations for these platforms. The goal should be to establish minimum standards for political content in order to ensure transparency regarding the financial resources used by political actors.

Gabriel Hofmann, doctoral student and research associate in the project, notes: «A majority of Swiss voters use social media in some form. Even if political content is only in the background, they are accessible to political actors, at least through paid content. Therefore, it is important to know which political actors buy reach and with which criteria.»

If this basic requirement is met, social media can contribute to better information for voters due to their low threshold.

About the project

«Direct Democracy Switzerland in the 21st Century (DDS-21)»
The project «Direct Democracy Switzerland in the 21st Century (DDS-21)» is funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) and examines current issues in voting research. A representative online survey of Swiss voters is conducted after each vote. The project examines four research questions in more detail: How does political advertising influence voters? What does the digitalization of the media landscape, and social media in particular, do to the opinion-forming process? How can political knowledge and political competence be measured? And finally, how are fundamental moral and political values ​​related to voting decisions?

Further resources

Contact

Gabriel Hofmann, doctoral student and research associate at the Center for Democracy Studies Aarau
hofmann@zda.uzh.ch, 062 836 94 57

Prof. Dr. Daniel Kübler, director, Center for Democray Studies Aarau
daniel.kuebler@zda.uzh.ch, 078 815 67 60

About the CDA

The Centre for Democracy Studies Aarau is a scientific research centre supported by the University of Zurich, the University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, the Canton of Aargau and the City of Aarau. It conducts basic research and addresses current issues relating to democracy – regionally, in Switzerland and worldwide. www.zdaarau.ch

Medienmitteilung Zentrum für Demokratie Aarau Sweet Sixteen - reif genug für Wahlen und Abstimmungen

Sweet Sixteen – mature enough for referendums and elections?

Are 16-year-olds ready for politics? Are they mature enough to make political decisions compared to young adults? Do they feel confident about making political decisions? How often do you keep yourself informed about political issues? A new study by the Centre for Democracy Aarau provides answers.

The debate on lowering the voting age to 16 is gaining momentum in Europe and raises important questions about the political maturity of minors. In political debates, one of the arguments put forward is that 16- and 17-year-olds are not yet mature enough to participate in political decision-making.

Comparing adolescents and young adults

The study by the Centre for Democracy Aarau examines the political maturity of young Swiss citizens aged between 16 and 25. It shows that 16- and 17-year-olds are politically as mature as the comparable category of 18- to 25-year-olds. The study is based on a representative survey of 4,000 young Swiss citizens.

Study author Robin Gut interprets the results as follows: «It is interesting to see that minors aged 16 and 17 are roughly as mature as young adults. These minors are not yet eligible to vote and are therefore not yet fully socialised into our political system. Nevertheless, they are just as politically mature as young adults. The result is consistent with most international studies on the political maturity of adolescents and young adults.»

What is political maturity?

The study measures «political maturity» using two subcategories: When it comes to «political disposition», i.e. attitudes towards politics in general, the data shows that 16- and 17-year-old Swiss citizens display a similar level of political interest and political self-efficacy as young adults. They also have a similar attitude towards voting as a civic duty. In addition, the younger group has a stronger intention to participate in elections. The intention to participate in referendums is comparable to that of 18- to 25-year-olds. Regarding «political behaviour shows that 16- and 17-year-olds consume political information in the media more frequently than 24- to 25-year-olds. They are also exposed to political discussions as frequently as young adults.

About the study

The Political Maturity of Youths and Young Adults: Empirical Evidence from Switzerland

Data basis: The study is based on a representative survey on political participation among young people, which was conducted by the Centre for Democracy Aarau in spring 2023 among teenagers and young adults aged between 16 and 25 in Switzerland. The Federal Statistical Office took a random sample of 20,000 people aged between 16 and 25 from the population register. A total of around 4,000 Swiss citizens took part in the survey. The survey was financed by the Swiss UNESCO Commission and the Swiss Society for the Common Good.

Methodology: For the analysis, respondents were weighted according to age, gender and language. Ordinal and binary logistic models were applied.

Download study

Gut, R., Ezzaini, J. & Kübler, D. (2025). The Political Maturity of Youths and Young Adults: Empirical Evidence from Switzerland. Swiss Political Science Review, 00, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12662

Contact

Robin Gut
robin.gut@zda.uzh.ch
076 470 87 05

About the ZDA

The Centre for Democracy Aarau is a scientific research centre supported by the University of Zurich, the University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, the Canton of Aargau and the City of Aarau. Es betreibt Grundlagenforschung und befasst sich mit aktuellen Fragen zur Demokratie – regional, in der Schweiz und weltweit. www.zdaarau.ch